Impact of Social Media Evidence on Wrongful Death Cases
Social media, apart from having an impact on people’s careers or relationships, also has a role in law enforcement. There is significant evidence that people may retrieve information from social media posts, and it can have an impact on the decisions made in court.
New Jersey is a place where people are very much using and utilizing social media apps, just like any other place. The field in which social media evidence has made an especially great deal of impression is the area involving cases where people have been wrongfully killed.
Wrongful death actions, which arise when another’s negligence or intentional action causes one to lose a loved one and pursue compensation for that loss, are typically complex given the emotional pain they inflict. You can get in touch with a lawyer to seek compensation. You can click here to learn more.
Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter are only the tip of application-born social platforms where your signing in would give them a veto on your personal life, recording almost every moment using laissez-faire tactics like all own a portion.
This content can be beneficial evidence for attorneys — a window into the mind, actions, and way of life before their death. A person’s social media posts or interactions on Facebook can show if they were struggling with mental health issues, their emotional state, and even if someone died because of risky behavior.
In causes of death cases, social media has contributed significantly to tangible evidence regarding negligence or misconduct claims.
A recent post by a product victim mentioning how the item is defective or that conditions are dangerous only minutes before they die would offer irrefutable proof of actual notice and predictability. In addition, social media activity reveals habits or intentions.
Undermining Claims and the Disputed Defense Strategies
On the other hand, social media proof can also work against wrongful death counts. Defense lawyers sometimes comb plaintiffs’ and their families’ social media profiles for anything that may contradict claims of injury.
For instance, if a family is requesting damages for the grief of losing someone, but their posts on social media display them doing things that indicate otherwise, then the defense can argue it was not as bad.
This is the type of evidence that can be most damaging when it comes to swaying jury perceptions, as visual or written social media content has become of its moment.
What is the Impact of Social Media on Jury Perceptions?
How social media evidence is presented in court may influence how the jury perceives it. Those posts then go to a jury as the only snapshot available into this person’s life and potential criminality. However, this can be a double-edged sword.
While such evidence may serve to humanize the victim and supply additional information about their life and death, it comes with an equal danger that what is exposed will then subject them to posthumous character judgment.
What are the Ethical and Privacy Implications in wrongful death cases?
It must be noted that the application of social media evidence in instances of wrongful death gives rise to essential aspects relating to ethics and privacy. Social media evidence is admitted on a relevancy and authenticity basis; the problem arises when you weigh that against the privacy rights of people.
At the same time, courts walk a delicate line between utilizing digital evidence, which could be seen as invasive, and upholding the integrity of the legal process.
Seek the proper compensation for your loss!
Having legal representation can help you support your claims. There is going to be a need for evidence to get the compensation you deserve. A lawyer can help you with that.
Passionate Writer, Blogger and Amazon Affiliate Expert since 2014.
